Open bfrg opened 6 years ago
Hi!
Thanks for being part of the Font Awesome Community.
Could you please provide more details?
Font Awesome version used (and type: otf/ttf), linux distribution (and version), terminal versions etc.
Please make sure that your request follows our bug report template
Updated above. I'm not sure if you got a notification.
Could you please try ad (f641) and address-card (f2bb)?
I suppose this has something to do with icon size.
If I'm correct, you should be able to see ad, but not address-card
It's the other way around. I can't see ad (f641) at font size 12, but I can see address-card (f2bb). It's so funny. When I change the font size to 11.999 or 12.001 I can see both.
🤷♂️
Describe the problem
I'm on
Gentoo Linux
(Kernel version 4.18.8). When I set the font size to 12 in my terminal, some Font Awesome symbols are not displayed correctly. Instead I see boxes with the corresponding hex code inside. Here is an example:What did you expect?
When I change the font size to 11.9, symbols are displayed as expected:
What version and implementation are you using?
Version: 5.4.1 otf
Tested with:
xfce4-terminal
version 0.8.7.4pangoterm
(unknown version)gvim
version 8.1.412Reproducible test case
Test file:
Either open the test file in
gvim
or print the file to standard output (usingcat
) in a terminal that supports Font Awesome symbols. This should work with any terminal that relies on pango. Change the font size to 11, 11.9, 12, 13 etc. The font itself doesn't matter since all applications rely on pango which looks for a fallback font when the current font doesn't provide a specific symbol.I'm honestly not even sure if that's related to Font Awesome. But I haven't observed anything like that with other fonts before.
Bug report checklist