Closed sozzled closed 4 years ago
We calculate using 1024 (not 1000), hence the the use of standard KiB, MiB & GiB designations.
old school - 1024 - i understand rounding things up but thats just being lazy
It's the difference between techie math and salespersons math.
As far as I am aware (and remember) it's always been 1024, and the textual designations were updated many revisions ago to reflect that. I honestly don't see the problem with them as they are and personally use the 1024 calculation.
@RussW is technically correct. That's not what I was taught at university but the nomenclature was changed 20 years ago and KiB is technically more accurate than KB, if we're dividing by 1000 and not by 1024.
Is this done now folks?
The last time I looked it all seems OK. I'll close this issue.
The source contains references to "KiB" , "MiB" and "GiB". These abbreviations are not in common/conventional use.
Recommend changing all "KiB" to "KB", "MiB" to "MB" and "GiB" to "GB"