Closed doraemonho closed 1 year ago
Should we include the FilteredLSRK54TimeStepper
?
I made a few changes @doraemonho. Have a look and let me know what you think.
Should we include the
FilteredLSRK54TimeStepper
?
It is workable but I am not sure if the solution is stable in the combination with the filter + low storage method. Maybe let us test it first and push this in the next update.?
@navidcy I changed the coef. values to rational form and also tested once. Could you check if the formatting is correct or not?
When tests pass I'll merge.
@doraemonho welcome to FourierFlows contributors ;)
@doraemonho welcome to FourierFlows contributors ;)
It is my pleasure : D
Implements a 4th-order 5-stages 2-storage Runge-Kutta timestepper,
LSRK54
.Closes #334