capraf
commented
2 months ago Hi all, on the other hand, due to this behavior Ethos detects more sensors (with other addresses) than in the past. This is a very welcome side affect. Best regards Friedhelm
Open Satcomix opened 2 months ago
capraf
commented
2 months ago Hi all, on the other hand, due to this behavior Ethos detects more sensors (with other addresses) than in the past. This is a very welcome side affect. Best regards Friedhelm
Hello Bertrand, hello RF-Team I closed the original issue because I have new information. There are different VFR ID designations between the transmitters in the Tandem X20S and Tandem XE series and the Tandem Pro series. The differences occur in the different receiver series. I tested with ArcherPlus R12+, R6mini, TD-R18, TD-R10, TD-R6, TD-MX. X20S and XE with ISRM 2.2.6 Archer receiver VFR ID 1A and tandem receiver VFR ID 18 With ISRM 2.2.7 on X20S and XE, all receivers show the same VFR ID 1A. My X20Pro still shows the differences between ID 18 (TD) and ID 1A (ACCESS), even after updating to ISRM-Pro 1.1.14 Are the different VFR IDs (18 or 1A) with the different receivers intended??? EDIT: 27.08.2024 The VFR value also seems too good to me for 868/900MHz transmission. It doesn't get below 99%. I couldn't notice this behavior before. Best regards, Torsten