6
SRR21422687
90
4.50 G
1.17 Gb
SRX17427003
CRC_16_S1_L001_R2_001
Reads are like follows:
>gnl|SRA|SRR21422687.1.1VH00699:3:AAAHK77HV:1:2412:56765:48347 Biological (Biological)
AAGCAGTGGTATCAACGCAGAGTACATGGGGACAGACCCGGAGAGCACCGCGAGGGCGGAGCTGCGTTCTCCTCTGCACAGATTTCGGTG
8
SRR21422689
28
1.40 G
598.12 Mb
SRX17427001
CRC_16_S1_L001_R1_001
Reads are like follows:
>gnl|SRA|SRR21422689.1.1VH00699:3:AAAHK77HV:1:2412:56765:48347 Biological (Biological)
ATGCCATTTGCGACCAGAGAGGTGAATT
So when you run cellranger or spaceranger, you will encounter "FASTQ header mismatch detected" problems because their header is different and shall both be like .
It really sucks and I guess it's because the author split a big SRA like CRC_16's SRA to 8 SRAs and their fastaq headers are renamed.
Not so many people really reproduce the paper and report their issues here.
The same problem is encountered by issue #15 .
So when you run cellranger or spaceranger, you will encounter "FASTQ header mismatch detected" problems because their header is different and shall both be like .
It really sucks and I guess it's because the author split a big SRA like CRC_16's SRA to 8 SRAs and their fastaq headers are renamed. Not so many people really reproduce the paper and report their issues here. The same problem is encountered by issue #15 .