FredHutch / easybuild-life-sciences

Howto and implementation documentation
https://fredhutch.github.io/easybuild-life-sciences/
21 stars 6 forks source link

Request for Python 3.7.3, OpenBLAS 0.3.5, llvm v8.0.0 and More #169

Closed scottsisco closed 5 years ago

scottsisco commented 5 years ago

Ticket:181375 Hi John,

If you have any questions just ask.

Thanks, Scott

Original Message: Hi Scott,

It's OK. I totally understand that you don't want to make exceptions.

Can I ask you to install the following for now:

1) python v3.7.3 with tcl-tk support

2) openBlas v0.3.5

2) python modules scipy v1.2.1 and numpy v1.162 compiled with OpenBlas

3) llvm v8.0.0 with lldb and with libstdc++ (not libc++) support

Thanks,

On 4/15/19 3:35 PM, Sisco, Scott wrote:

I apologize the only thing we support is our easybuild environment module system and we cannot make any exceptions. We have a team member who spends a large amount of time installing applications and he would happy build a module with the versions of pyhton3 and llvm we are missing. What are the exact versions you are looking to have installed?

Thanks, Scott

Date: Monday, April 15, 2019 at 2:56 PM Subject: Re: Help with login on the HPC resources

Hi Scott,

Thank you for sharing the links. I did get my email set up (Cc'ed here too).

I can see that you have maintain a large list of software on the cluster. I notice that some packages that I need are not up to date. For example, llvm and python3. I might also need to install some other packages down the road for my project. The reason why I brought up homebrew is that once set up I would be able to install or update packages for my project so that I did not have to ask for your time. I wouldn't need your attention to maintain homebrew either except that homebrew's bottles are supposed to be installed in /home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew (equivalent to /usr/local on Mac), which I don't have access to. Even if you could just create a symlink /home/linuxbrew -> /home/dlin2 that would help me a great lot.

bmcgough commented 5 years ago

I've been in contact with the requester here, and I think we can move forward with existing versions for now, but we should know soon if that will work. If not, I suspect we can build these in the foss-2018b toolchain, and perhaps a separate Python without our module bundle... ?

fizwit commented 5 years ago

All of these packages exist, but not at the exact versions. Newer versions will be available once we transfer to 2018b. Since Ben has been in contact with the customer, I will close this for now.