Open leobroom opened 2 years ago
Hi Leon,
Thank you so much for your insight into the project. Your proposed organization of the script indeed looks much clearer! I have been working on this definition for a while, iterating after each test print, and over time, the definition grew messier. I am going through the last phase of my PhD and have no spare time to clean up the documentation (as you can tell!). After the submission, I plan to revisit the documentation and add clarity for more audiences. I am also very open to inviting more contributors familiar with 3D printing with Grasshopper.
Best, Freddie
Hey Freddie, thank you for your fast response. All the best for your PhD thesis! Maybe i was not clear with my message, sorry. I could start with the organisation/ documenting process - when I know that you are okay with it and from your point in would make sense. So if you need help with that - just write me.
Hi Leon, I am expecting to upload the new version of Grasshopper script sometime in late November. Perhaps we can catchup again then. Thank you!
Hey Freddie, first of all: Great work and congratulation for this astonishing project! I love it!
I looked inside the Grasshopper definitions and have to say that a part of the performance issues may be caused by the inefficient script, but it is difficult to read and understand the dependies. I know that there is a ton of work in these scripts involved, so please do not feel ofended.
This is how it actual looks like:
It should look more like this:
I propose:
I would like to contribute and have some experience in additive manufacturing and writing slicers in grasshopper.
Now you wrote that the definition is going through a series of iterations and if i or someone else would now start to organise it - manual merge problems could occur. Does it make sense to reorganise and cleanup the script?
What is your opinion about that Issue?
Greetings, Leon