Closed gbroques closed 4 years ago
Vocx suggested "namespace workbenches" on the forum: https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=47460#p407171
mnesarco proposed "Legacy Workbenches" as opposed to "old": https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=47460#p407530
loo thinks "legacy" / "namespace" workbenches might be a good name pair: https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=47460#p407555
Looks like the thread has proposed the terms "Legacy" and "Standard" workbenches: https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=47460&start=10#p408590
This implies having a set of FreeCAD workbench standards -- which is now the focus of thread.
Not sure if we came to any agreement, but I think legacy / namespace-workbench the best option. Is it ok, to modify the docs to match this proposal?
Not sure if we came to any agreement, but I think legacy / namespace-workbench the best option. Is it ok, to modify the docs to match this proposal?
Yes, I think that's an improvement upon the terminology of "old" vs. "new".
From the README:
Let's come up with better names than "old" vs. "new". Those names only describe the temporal aspects of each workbench style (i.e. one is traditional usage, and one is a pattern this template advocates for adoption).
Maybe "Modern Workbenches" or "Packageable Workbenches" is better than "new workbenches"?
One of these proposed terms seem to capture the benefits or motivation of the "new style": https://github.com/FreeCAD/freecad.workbench_starterkit#motivation-for-new-style-modules
All of the benefits are things you'd expect from modern or packageable software.
Are there any word-smiths out there with better suggestions for names?