Closed Blakeley00 closed 4 years ago
Nice that you found out how to do this (got your email and btw. the sourceforge repository seems to still be the main one so its not important to have it as a pull request, a link would also work). It is always good when people want to help. Sadly, I was about to do a conflicting change to the homepage this weekend. I would have kept the 0.11.6 Link and added another Link to the nightly release above. Additionally, I'm not so sure if it's really helpful to remove information on current version on the other page?
Hi winter,
Nice that you found out how to do this (got your email and btw. the sourceforge repository seems to still be the main one so its not important to have it as a pull request, a link would also work). It is always good when people want to help.
No worries mate. So instead of a pull request I just post links to my commits? if so where would you want that posted?
Sadly, I was about to do a conflicting change to the homepage this weekend. I would have kept the 0.11.6 Link and added another Link to the nightly release above.
Yours sounds even better as yeah I wanted to put a nightly releases link on the main page but thought I'd start simple with my changes haha. My link is still the same as the old one, I just removed the version number so that you don't have to change it every single time you do a new release. Plus everyone who visits the site sees that version number and then thinks it hasn't been touched in years. As having that version number 'ages things' somewhat to regular lurkers.
Additionally, I'm not so sure if it's really helpful to remove information on current version on the other page?
Removing the version number from the status page means you don't have to update that page every time a new version is released. The line blow it about the project being in constant development that links to the sourceforge page seems good enough on its own. However its up to you mate, I'm just trying to reduce the mentioning of version numbers around the site so you don't have to update 20 different places on the site when a new one is released haha. Plus like I said above having 11.6 everywhere makes it looks like there's been no progress in years.
Check out my new downloads page submission (hopefully it worked as weird things happened when I tried to push through a new downloads.html page changes pull request (possibly becuase I've already done a previous pull request under the master branch?). I can see it above so I think it worked and just added it to the existing pull request. You'll probably want to do more with it or do something different but hopefully I've given you some ideas for improving it and getting people to the nightly releases. I've emailed you some pictures of the differences. The nightly releases needs a new icon though.
Here's the old version which has duplicated headings and duplicate java downloads:
And here's my modified one with all the new stuff detailed in the commit.. I also H4'ed the test and stable download section headings and stuck in another colony picture to better separate the new nightly section from the stable release section:
Well, I did not try to discourage you from using the pull request feature, just mentioned an alternative in case of you having problems with it. One problem you encountered is, when you make later changes to the branch you submitted the pull request for, the pull request is changed. That means, for unrelated changes people on github usually create a different branch named after the changes and submit another pull request. Btw., this should make no difference with this, though this github mirror is not always up to date, the main repo is still on sourceforge: https://sourceforge.net/p/freecol/git/ci/master/tree/ It is still undecided if/when a real switch to github is done (cause of time constraints mentioned below). This also affects your changes to the download page, because the next full release might be still uploaded to sourceforge firstly, while nightly releases happen on github. I'm also kinda hoping for more feedback from other people on the website stuff, but everyone seems to still have real life time constraints since a longer time ago, including the project lead Mike Pope.
Edit: Sorry, at first I clicked the complete diff for the pull request, where the commit message was not shown and thought you had deleted the sourceforge links.
Thanks for the info winter, makes sense now. :)
Nah I haven't deleted ANY sourceforge links. All I did was remove 1 duplicate download link and 1 duplicate title text and then inserted all the new github nightly release stuff above the old links. If you look closely at the pictures and the code you'll see all the old download links are still there completely unchanged. I didn't want to mess with any of that.
EDIT: Now I've just seen your edit haha. You figured out on your own that I hadn't deleted them anyway lol.
Well when there's a new release all those 11.6 downloads will need to be changed by you guys anyway so my changes should have no affect on that process, as like I said above I just added new stuff for the nightly releases above the main downloads and didn't mess with the old stuff.
I'll send another email out to the dev list with a link to this pull. Hopefully it'll bring that extra feedback.
Thank you, for helping with this. I did some rebasing onto the sourceforge master and used most of your changes, except the one in status.html. (Btw., it is safer to create a new branch than use your fork's master for pull requests.) I then added a number of small website updates myself, too. Please, get last version from https://sourceforge.net/p/freecol/git if you'd like to see them, as it may take a bit of time until David triggers an update to the GitHub mirror!
Removed version numbers from current status and main index home page to reduce places that 'age' the site and make the project look abandoned and also reduce website update work when new versions are released.
Have done major update to downloads section that features the nightly releases and removed some duplication issues.
No doubt you guys will want to further alter and improve my suggestions. But hopefully I've helped get the ball rolling.