Define portNOP in RP2040 port

chinglee-iot commented 4 months ago

Description

Define portNOP in RP2040 port. This is used in on target test for busy looping.

Test Steps

Checklist:

[x] I have tested my changes. No regression in existing tests.
[ ] ~~I have modified and/or added unit-tests to cover the code changes in this Pull Request.~~

Related Issue

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

codecov[bot] commented 4 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 93.00%. Comparing base (30f6061) to head (4e44157).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1003 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 93.00% 93.00% ======================================= Files 6 6 Lines 3200 3200 Branches 879 879 ======================================= Hits 2976 2976 Misses 111 111 Partials 113 113 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/pull/1003/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/pull/1003/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS) | `93.00% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.