Fix reliability issues in CMake sample

kar-rahul-aws commented 1 year ago

Description

This PR fixes reliability issues in Sonar Cloud tests, caused by unreachable code.

Test Steps

Re-run the Sonar cloud tests for reliability.

Checklist:

[x] I have tested my changes. No regression in existing tests.
[ ] I have modified and/or added unit-tests to cover the code changes in this Pull Request.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

codecov[bot] commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (30283b5) 93.13% compared to head (15b807d) 93.13%.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #835 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 93.13% 93.13% ======================================= Files 6 6 Lines 2549 2549 Branches 608 608 ======================================= Hits 2374 2374 Misses 120 120 Partials 55 55 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/pull/835/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/pull/835/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS) | `93.13% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.