Coverity Report Directory Fix

Skptak commented 9 months ago

Description

The curl command to send the report expects the tar file to be in its current directory. The step either needed to have the working-directory: set to the build directory, or the tar file needs to be created in the parent directory.

Test Steps

Checklist:

[X] I have tested my changes. No regression in existing tests.
[X] I have modified and/or added unit-tests to cover the code changes in this Pull Request.

Related Issue

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

codecov[bot] commented 9 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (61f35dc) 93.64% compared to head (109e0d9) 93.64%.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #903 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 93.64% 93.64% ======================================= Files 6 6 Lines 3179 3179 Branches 885 885 ======================================= Hits 2977 2977 Misses 95 95 Partials 107 107 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/pull/903/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/pull/903/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS) | `93.64% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.