Remove lint suppression comment

chinglee-iot commented 8 months ago

Description

FreeRTOS kernel now make use of coverity static analysis tool for MISRA and static analysis. Remove lint suppression in comment.

Test Steps

Checklist:

[ ] I have tested my changes. No regression in existing tests.
[ ] I have modified and/or added unit-tests to cover the code changes in this Pull Request.

Related Issue

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

codecov[bot] commented 8 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (a2712b5) 93.78% compared to head (2b1c2cc) 93.78%.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #920 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 93.78% 93.78% ======================================= Files 6 6 Lines 3184 3184 Branches 885 885 ======================================= Hits 2986 2986 Misses 91 91 Partials 107 107 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/pull/920/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/pull/920/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS) | `93.78% <100.00%> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.