FreeRTOS / FreeRTOS-Kernel

FreeRTOS kernel files only, submoduled into https://github.com/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS and various other repos.
https://www.FreeRTOS.org
MIT License
2.52k stars 1.05k forks source link

Fix ThirdParty/GCC/ATmega formatting #965

Closed feilipu closed 5 months ago

feilipu commented 5 months ago

Title

Fix ThirdParty/GCC/ATmega formatting.

Description

Unnecessary white space was introduced in #768 which affected the formatting of assembly code. This PR returns the correct formatting. No functional change.

Test Steps

No functional change

Checklist:

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

codecov[bot] commented 5 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (04cb022) 93.64% compared to head (60305b3) 93.64%.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #965 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 93.64% 93.64% ======================================= Files 6 6 Lines 3194 3194 Branches 885 885 ======================================= Hits 2991 2991 Misses 91 91 Partials 112 112 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/pull/965/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/pull/965/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS) | `93.64% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

sonarcloud[bot] commented 5 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud