FreeRTOS / FreeRTOS-Kernel

FreeRTOS kernel files only, submoduled into https://github.com/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS and various other repos.
https://www.FreeRTOS.org
MIT License
2.52k stars 1.05k forks source link

Update version number #983

Closed paulbartell closed 5 months ago

paulbartell commented 5 months ago

Description

Update the reported version number on the main branch

Test Steps

Checklist:

Related Issue

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

codecov[bot] commented 5 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (938ec0f) 93.62% compared to head (6a25fb8) 93.62%.

:exclamation: Current head 6a25fb8 differs from pull request most recent head 13a088a. Consider uploading reports for the commit 13a088a to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #983 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 93.62% 93.62% ======================================= Files 6 6 Lines 3199 3199 Branches 886 886 ======================================= Hits 2995 2995 Misses 92 92 Partials 112 112 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/pull/983/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/pull/983/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS) | `93.62% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

kstribrnAmzn commented 5 months ago

Let's update the manifest.yml value too then

sonarcloud[bot] commented 5 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.8% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

paulbartell commented 5 months ago

Let's update the manifest.yml value too then

Updated!

kstribrnAmzn commented 5 months ago

Can you try running the manifest verifier script on this change? If it passed then I'll be happy.

paulbartell commented 5 months ago

Can you try running the manifest verifier script on this change? If it passed then I'll be happy.

It runs as part of the CI for this repo. Here's the output from running it locally:

% python3 manifest-verifier.py --repo-root-path ./
INFO - PARSING manifest.yml FILE: /redacted/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS/Source
INFO - No dependencies in /redacted/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS/Source/manifest.yml. Exiting