FreeRTOS / FreeRTOS-Kernel

FreeRTOS kernel files only, submoduled into https://github.com/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS and various other repos.
https://www.FreeRTOS.org
MIT License
2.52k stars 1.05k forks source link

Fix small bugs in Kernel #998

Closed AniruddhaKanhere closed 4 months ago

AniruddhaKanhere commented 5 months ago

Description

Test Steps

Checklist:

Related Issue

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

codecov[bot] commented 5 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (1a500f1) 92.97% compared to head (92ae6cf) 92.97%.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #998 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 92.97% 92.97% ======================================= Files 6 6 Lines 3219 3219 Branches 890 890 ======================================= Hits 2993 2993 Misses 111 111 Partials 115 115 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/pull/998/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/pull/998/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS) | `92.97% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=FreeRTOS#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Skptak commented 4 months ago

Do we know what version of coverity is used in the coverity_scan.yml file and if the changes to the config are compatible with that version?

sonarcloud[bot] commented 4 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud