Issue tracking for project migrating FreeCEN to FreeCEN2 genealogy record database and search engine architecture. Code developed here is based on that developed in MyopicVicar
One reason that some pieces in the PARMS are broken up into parts A B C etc is that all or part of the piece is in a different county to the registration district. This means that it is difficult for our searches to find the inter-county records.
By having part of the piece e.g. RGxx_xxxxA in the registrationn district county and another part of the piece e.g. RGxx_xxxxB in another county it means that our searches are better able to locate the record being searched for because it is in the correct county.
We have a number of pieces that are in the vld data set but if they were in the csv data set woul be located in the correct county.
I propose that we ask coordinators to convert just one vld piece that involves inter-county entries each month. The piece would need breaking up into the new piece parts and then each part re-validated. The piece(s) could then be removed from the vld data set and incorporated into the csv data set.
This would improve our search capabilities for these inter-county records significantly.
This can be done once the reconciliation of the civil parishes is completed.
One reason that some pieces in the PARMS are broken up into parts A B C etc is that all or part of the piece is in a different county to the registration district. This means that it is difficult for our searches to find the inter-county records. By having part of the piece e.g. RGxx_xxxxA in the registrationn district county and another part of the piece e.g. RGxx_xxxxB in another county it means that our searches are better able to locate the record being searched for because it is in the correct county. We have a number of pieces that are in the vld data set but if they were in the csv data set woul be located in the correct county. I propose that we ask coordinators to convert just one vld piece that involves inter-county entries each month. The piece would need breaking up into the new piece parts and then each part re-validated. The piece(s) could then be removed from the vld data set and incorporated into the csv data set. This would improve our search capabilities for these inter-county records significantly.
This can be done once the reconciliation of the civil parishes is completed.
Geoff