Closed DeniseColbert closed 7 months ago
Message sent tonight to everyone to whom I would send the Coordinator newsletter ou to, but I also included transcribers as they are 'on-the-ground' working with these types of registers and I do feel their input could be invaluable to a project like this.
Have had about 12 responses, mostly from transcribers. Michael Clarke has asked if this topic could be added as a discussion area in the Transcribers group. I have no idea how to access the group (I am not a member) so I might need to join the group and then access the area in question if it can be made.
Sandra to provide the feedback document.
This is what I have tallied so far. Another two responses have come in this morning which have not been added.
@DeniseColbert to create a Google Sheet from Sandra's file and place it in a subfolder for this issue on the drive
I have added some suggested banns fields in red.
Central file now on drive, please use this version: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uLMxG8yJRBhrCfrF4na9JutMNfpmaDI9/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=102304861870410029965&rtpof=true&sd=true
Handled by ComETT so closing
Monumental Inscriptions (MI) Marriage Bonds (MB) Marriage Banns (MN)
@CommsCoord will call out to Coordinators to canvas different, locality specific info to take into account, and begin drafting spec.