🚀 Here's the PR! #39

See Sweep's progress at the progress dashboard!

💎 Sweep Pro: I'm using GPT-4. You have unlimited GPT-4 tickets. (tracking ID: 7385639100)

[!TIP] I can email you next time I complete a pull request if you set up your email here!

Actions (click)

[ ] ↻ Restart Sweep

Step 1: 🔎 Searching

I found the following snippets in your repository. I will now analyze these snippets and come up with a plan.

Some code snippets I think are relevant in decreasing order of relevance (click to expand). If some file is missing from here, you can mention the path in the ticket description.

https://github.com/FreightCompanionDavid/SmartAPIHub/blob/e42f8d10f1acaa7321b54d81c25b71a1a7fcc827/logger.js#L1-L29 https://github.com/FreightCompanionDavid/SmartAPIHub/blob/e42f8d10f1acaa7321b54d81c25b71a1a7fcc827/handleImageGenerationRequest.js#L1-L25 https://github.com/FreightCompanionDavid/SmartAPIHub/blob/e42f8d10f1acaa7321b54d81c25b71a1a7fcc827/handleDiscussionsRequest.js#L1-L28 https://github.com/FreightCompanionDavid/SmartAPIHub/blob/e42f8d10f1acaa7321b54d81c25b71a1a7fcc827/handleEmbeddingRequest.js#L1-L53 https://github.com/FreightCompanionDavid/SmartAPIHub/blob/e42f8d10f1acaa7321b54d81c25b71a1a7fcc827/handleImageUnderstandingRequest.js#L1-L55

Step 2: ⌨️ Coding

[X] Modify logger.js ! No changes made Edit
Modify logger.js with contents:
• No changes are directly requested to logger.js in the issue, but ensure that the logger setup in logger.js supports structured logging as it currently does. The winston logger is already configured to use JSON format, which is suitable for structured logging. Therefore, no modifications are needed here unless there's a specific logging format mentioned in the issue that isn't already covered.

[X] Running GitHub Actions for logger.js ✗ Edit
Check logger.js with contents:

[X] Modify handleImageGenerationRequest.js ✓ https://github.com/FreightCompanionDavid/SmartAPIHub/commit/614fbd961afa2d0d397845d09c6d8ccf010da713 Edit
Modify handleImageGenerationRequest.js with contents:
• Replace the existing logger.error call in the catch block with the structured logging format as described in the issue. Change: - logger.error("Error in image generation with DALL·E:", { error: error.message, prompt }); This aligns with the structured logging practices mentioned in the issue.

--- 
+++ 
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
         return { success: true, images: response.images };
     } catch (error) {
         progress.progress = 100; // Update progress even in case of failure
-        logger.error("Error in image generation with DALL·E:", { error: error.message, prompt }); // Enhanced error logging with more context
+        logger.error({message: "Error in image generation with DALL·E", error: error.message, prompt}); // Structured logging format
         throw new Error("Failed to generate image.");
     }
 }

[X] Running GitHub Actions for handleImageGenerationRequest.js ✓ Edit
Check handleImageGenerationRequest.js with contents:

Ran GitHub Actions for 614fbd961afa2d0d397845d09c6d8ccf010da713:

[X] Modify handleDiscussionsRequest.js ✓ https://github.com/FreightCompanionDavid/SmartAPIHub/commit/b0732cbfa0feff4c3a5ff0be21b51e005a58116b Edit
Modify handleDiscussionsRequest.js with contents:
• Update the logger.error calls in both the catch blocks of createDiscussion and getDiscussions functions to use the structured logging format. For example, change: - logger.error("Error creating discussion:", { error: error.message, content, author }); This ensures consistency with the structured logging approach.

--- 
+++ 
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
         discussions.push(discussion);
         return discussion;
     } catch (error) {
-        logger.error("Error creating discussion:", { error: error.message, content, author });
+        logger.error({message: "Error creating discussion", error: error.message, content, author});
         throw new Error("Failed to create discussion");
     }
 }
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
     try {
         return discussions;
     } catch (error) {
-        logger.error("Error retrieving discussions:", { error: error.message });
+        logger.error({message: "Error retrieving discussions", error: error.message});
         throw new Error("Failed to retrieve discussions");
     }
 }

[X] Running GitHub Actions for handleDiscussionsRequest.js ✓ Edit
Check handleDiscussionsRequest.js with contents:

Ran GitHub Actions for b0732cbfa0feff4c3a5ff0be21b51e005a58116b:

[X] Modify handleEmbeddingRequest.js ✓ https://github.com/FreightCompanionDavid/SmartAPIHub/commit/e304b7c1ca97f0c6a8b304db958917e189a0b347 Edit
Modify handleEmbeddingRequest.js with contents:
• Modify the logger.error call in the catch block to use the structured logging format. Specifically, change: - logger.error("Failed to generate text embeddings due to an error:", { error: error.message, text, model }); This update adheres to the structured logging practices enhancement requested.

--- 
+++ 
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
         res.status(200).send({ success: true, embedding: response.data });
     } catch (error) {
         progress.progress = 100; // Ensure progress is updated in case of an error
-        logger.error("Failed to generate text embeddings due to an error:", { error: error.message, text, model });
+        logger.error({message: "Failed to generate text embeddings due to an error", error: error.message, text, model});

         // Respond with an error message
         res.status(500).send({ message: "Failed to generate text embeddings. Please ensure your request is properly authenticated and the text parameter meets the required criteria." });

[X] Running GitHub Actions for handleEmbeddingRequest.js ✓ Edit
Check handleEmbeddingRequest.js with contents:

Ran GitHub Actions for e304b7c1ca97f0c6a8b304db958917e189a0b347:

[X] Modify handleImageUnderstandingRequest.js ✓ https://github.com/FreightCompanionDavid/SmartAPIHub/commit/de006ed428fd6b3cfbac4e0ecea493caabc2c753 Edit
Modify handleImageUnderstandingRequest.js with contents:
• Update the logger.error call in the catch block to reflect the structured logging format. Change: - logger.error("Error in image understanding with GPT-4V:", { error: error.message, image, prompt }); This modification aligns with the structured logging format described in the issue.

--- 
+++ 
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
   } catch (error) {
     // Ensure progress is updated even in case of failure
     progress.progress = 100;
-    logger.error("Error in image understanding with GPT-4V:", { error: error.message, image, prompt });
+    logger.error({ message: "Error in image understanding with GPT-4V", error: error.message, image, prompt });
     throw new Error("Failed to understand image.");
   }
 }

[X] Running GitHub Actions for handleImageUnderstandingRequest.js ✓ Edit
Check handleImageUnderstandingRequest.js with contents:

Ran GitHub Actions for de006ed428fd6b3cfbac4e0ecea493caabc2c753:

Step 3: 🔁 Code Review

I have finished reviewing the code for completeness. I did not find errors for sweep/logging_practices.

🎉 Latest improvements to Sweep:

New dashboard launched for real-time tracking of Sweep issues, covering all stages from search to coding.
Integration of OpenAI's latest Assistant API for more efficient and reliable code planning and editing, improving speed by 3x.
Use the GitHub issues extension for creating Sweep issues directly from your editor.

💡 To recreate the pull request edit the issue title or description. ^{Something wrong? Let us know.}

This is an automated message generated by Sweep AI.

FreightCompanionDavid / SmartAPIHub

Sweep: Logging Practices #33

Details

Branch

🚀 Here's the PR! #39

Actions (click)

Step 1: 🔎 Searching

Step 2: ⌨️ Coding

Step 3: 🔁 Code Review