Closed pamil closed 7 years ago
ExcludeFeaturesExtension
is not bad, but after adding support for Behat CLI syntax (already working on this) we will be able to skip also specific scenarios, rather than features 😄 So then this name will be misleading... hmm...
Some rabbis say yes, and some rabbis say no
Behat uses the "specification" term, so ExcludeSpecificationsExtension
may be appropriate.
9 got me thinking and it looks like "Skip" part in SkipExtension might be misleading, as defined features aren't skipped during testing, but excluded from the test suite.
I propose something like ExcludeExtension, although it is still not as specific as I would like it to be (what about ExcludeFeaturesExtension?).
Should we rename it?