Add basic documentation

[AnderGray]

Adds a template for GitHub documentation.

If all is well, then a docs page will be hosted in a gh-pages branch when the PR is merged.

Locally the API-docstrings says the functions are missing. I believe this because I'm using the registered version instead of the master branch. Not sure if this will be a problem in the online version.

[FriesischScott]

The documentation has to be build against the branch and not the registered version.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #32 (5588608) into master (8cdc686) will increase coverage by 0.04%. The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #32      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.64%   99.69%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          14       14              
  Lines         284      323      +39     
==========================================
+ Hits          283      322      +39     
  Misses          1        1              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/inputs/inputs.jl	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/inputs/parameter.jl	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/inputs/randomvariable.jl	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/inputs/jointdistribution.jl	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/models/polyharmonicspline.jl	96.96% <100.00%> (+0.41%)	:arrow_up:
src/sensitivity/gradient.jl	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/simulations/subset.jl	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/models/model.jl	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 10 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update 8cdc686...5588608. Read the comment docs.

[FriesischScott]

@AnderGray I think we should just merge like this and then gradually improve on the documentation. Ideally we would do this now but I am way to lazy for that :smile:.

I made a few changes:

• Removed related packages that we do not use yet. I don't see the point in name-dropping arbitrary packages.
• I also removed the bibliography. I think it would be better to cite the relevant literature at the appropriate place directly in the documentation, e.g. reference the line sampling paper when we explain how to run the simulation.
• A lot of restructuring and moving files into subfolders.

What do you think?

[FriesischScott]

I don't exactly understand why pull_request_target fails pull_request fails, but I will remove the required check on the former.

[AnderGray]

All the changes look good to me.

Happy to merge once we fix the pull_request_target fail

[FriesischScott]

I'll remove pull_request_target in favor of pull_request. I tried the former to enable coverage stats for pull requests made from other repos. Didn't work though.