Open FrittenKeeZ opened 4 years ago
Change namespace from FrittenKeeZ to Frebs
@FrittenKeeZ I do think this is a bad idea, do you have any specific reasons why you would want to change the Namespace to this???
I believe this should only happen if you decide to move the repository to another entity called Frebs. Let's have a conversation around this and know how this could affect current users. I believe it should be removed from the Roadmap.
Change namespace from FrittenKeeZ to Frebs
@FrittenKeeZ I do think this is a bad idea, do you have any specific reasons why you would want to change the Namespace to this???
I believe this should only happen if you decide to move the repository to another entity called Frebs. Let's have a conversation around this and know how this could affect current users. I believe it should be removed from the Roadmap.
Only that it's shorter and simpler - regardless it would be a breaking change and a major dev version if I do, but I'm aiming to do it for 1.0.0
Shorter and Simpler isn't a great reason for changing the namespace 😄.
Are you also changing your Username and Namespace across your other packages to frebs?🤔
Shorter and Simpler isn't a great reason for changing the namespace 😄.
Are you also changing your Username and Namespace across your other packages to frebs?🤔
I don't really have any other noteworthy packages, but I would change the namespace across the board, yes.
Ohh, okay. That's justifiable.
Hopefully this would be effectively documented. Let me know when you want to make this change so I could help implement and document it.
@FrittenKeeZ Are you still working on open tasks ?
@mgamal92 I want to get back and update this for Laravel 10 and probably remove Laravel 5 in the process - there's been a lot of other projects taking my time, but I want to progress this one soon, and Laravel 10 is a good excuse :)
@FrittenKeeZ May I help you in this package and work on some tasks ? so we can arrange that between us
@mgamal92 Sure, just open a PR
@FrittenKeeZ Sure but are there some tasks which have more priority ?
@mgamal92 I've just updated the roadmap, but you can just choose what you feel like
@FrittenKeeZ OK great
I would consider changing the "withEntities" to take a collection or array of entities. This would make it much easier to use programmatically, when you chain the facade.
Also it would be great if the withStartTime would take a null as well, so you do not have to wrap it in a if sentence first to make sure it exists, if you are generating these from some user input. Same with withEndTime.
Will there be an update to support the latest Laravel framework e.g. 11.10.0?
@jn-devops yes, I've thought about removing support for everything below Laravel 9 and update tests accordingly
0.1.x - 0.2.0
\
>0.2.x
Vouchers::redeemable()
for conditional checksFrittenKeeZ
toFrebs
without
scopesFREEBIE2021
withCode
withCounter
withCounterStep
withCounterSeparator
withCounterPadding
withCodeFormatter
unredeem()
andunredeemable()
helper methods>1.x