dired-{prev,next}-dirline are not subtree-aware. I could imagine a variant that skips sub-level content, stopping at the prev/next directory line at the same level, respectively. The functions could be advised transparently, or dired-subtree could get corresponding function.
dired-{prev,next}-dirline
are not subtree-aware. I could imagine a variant that skips sub-level content, stopping at the prev/next directory line at the same level, respectively. The functions could be advised transparently, or dired-subtree could get corresponding function.