Closed nedsalk closed 4 days ago
Good find, to test this I wonder if we could fork this repo, create a test secret REPO_TOKEN
, then modify the dependabot interval to force it to open a PR and then see if the workflow runs there?
@maschad I'm fairly certain that this is the root cause because this solution solved the same problem in #1848. IMO we don't need to go out of our way to test it; merging and verifying the behavior live is okay in this case because, even if this PR is a wrong solution, the workflow itself doesn't block anybody from work nor is it of crucial, "we must get this right the first time" importance.
Coverage Report:
Lines | Branches | Functions | Statements |
---|---|---|---|
80.3%(+0%) | 71.8%(+0%) | 77.56%(+0%) | 80.37%(+0%) |
I believe that this is the same issue that plagued the changeset PR, which was solved in #1848.