UI improvements

[scoltman]

checkboxes indicate work that is ready to happen. uncheckboxed bullet points need further discussion landing page:

• [ ] use the full fact muli font
• [ ] change the analyse button colour
• [ ] history list needs bottom margin
• [ ] include fullfact logo
• [ ] include link to fullfact website
• [ ] title should be left aligned
• number of found claims should be included and shown on the history? this may require backend work
• remove the top bar or improve branding?
• links need to look more like links? is the grey hover clear enough?
• rename 'history' to previous searches/videos, or remove?
• include time as there may be many videos per day?
• url should be more meaningful replace 'runs' with 'video'?
• are runs unique? if the same video is submitted will it be processed twice?

claims page:

• [ ] claim times should be at the beginning of the sentence
• [ ] worth checking should use green highlight not red
• [ ] 'This analysis may be incomplete.' needs explanation
• [ ] 'worth checking', what's the tag of 'may be worth checking' needs explanation
• [ ] both 0 claims and analysing states need explanation
• [ ] title and url of video should be shown on page, this is epecially important in case of video failing to embed
• [ ] improve contrast for black text on dark hello for 'may be worth checking'
• [ ] embedded youtube video should be scaled to 1/3 page with max width? i guess it's a trade off, might be better to have a two column with video in one column?
• should raw transcript text should have times?
• should raw transcript text actually be sentences, or use another method other than subtitles?
• maybe a filter for 'worth checking', what's the quality of 'may be worth checking' is it a good idea to include both?
• when raw sentence is clicked should it be highlighted?
• back button to history should be shown on page, not obvious that raphael name is clickable? if top bar is removed we might be able to replace with something more obvious
• should we move away from youtube embedding as it would be more reliable to host our own version of the video? this may have copyright implications?

[dcorney]

Q: are runs unique? if the same video is submitted will it be processed twice? A: yes it will be processed twice.