Open beginner984 opened 4 years ago
Hi there,
Thanks for getting in touch.
Yes you probably should receive more clonality information than that you're right! Would you be able to provide some example data so I can look into it for you?
And regrading your logR issue here, setting logR arbitrarily to 1 should work fine.
Best wishes, Benedict
From heart thank you very much to answer me because I really need help
My variant caller has been Strelka
and copy number caller SCAT
For LogR
I have just put 1
for all
For tumour depth I put tumour ref counts +tumour var counts
I have attached my data sets here
https://www.dropbox.com/s/jq7ubwkiyn17dbn/My_data.RData?dl=0
Please have a look
I don't know if this does affect the results, but after producing variants and copy number data individually, by genomicrange R package I done intersection s that mutations be in the copy number segments
Thanks a million
Hi,
I can see that chromosomes in "CHROM" column of your cna_data object contain no "chr" prefix. This is an issue since Palimpsest uses these values to match with the vcf table, where the "CHROM" column does contain the "chr" prefix. You should add the "chr" prefix in cna_data and try again. Also many lines are duplicated in your cna_data object.
Hope this helps, Eric
Hello
By
393472 SNPs
for17 samples
, after running your software I am getting600 clonal variants and 83 sub-clonal
the rest are NADo you think something is going wrong with my data?
How it is possible from 393472 SNPs , less 1000 returns clonality information? I look forward to hearing from you and thank you so much