Closed mccall-lab-OU closed 3 months ago
Thanks so much for looking into this. We checked this and as you mentioned, TIC is doing it feature-centric in the app. But the scaling is totally fine. I checked the notebooks as well and they are working fine. We will fix the TIC issue and release the corrected version soon.
The TIC issue is fixed now. Thanks again for bringing this to our attention
there may be a glitch in the normalization process in the web app, where it's normalizing by feature rather than by sample (basically in the wrong direction). For example, in the TIC-normalized data, the sum of the peak areas for each feature adds up to 1, rather than the sum of the peak areas for all the features in a given each sample adding to 1. In your data for example, when I sum the TIC-normalized peak areas I get 57.98 for SD_01-2018_10_a, and 52.998 for SD_01-2018_10_b. If I sum the peak areas by features instead, I get a sum of 1 for 92572_151.0351_13.36, 1 for 2513_151.0351_1.13, and so on. I did not manually verify the center-scaling process, so I'm not sure if it's correct.