Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
the default Z coordinates for the slicing of tokamak results should be changed as per discussion with Raul:
Yes, the B2_U and B1_L “z(m)” values appear to be swapped.
The Z levels in 3FM52L were conceived for the building, and so I’m not 100% sure they will be meaningful for the tokamak. But the ones used in 34YGP3 and shown below in your email are not suitable, in my opinion. They are too high, for instance:
In L1_I and L2_I you cannot see the ports, whereas the name suggests the section should pass right through them.
In B1_U and L1_U you can actually see the bottom of the L1 and L2 ports, respectively.
These things don’t make much sense.
I’d say for future studies this should be reconsidered. If the ones of 3FM52L are suitable, they should be used. If not, a tuned version should be conceived.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. the default Z coordinates for the slicing of tokamak results should be changed as per discussion with Raul:
Yes, the B2_U and B1_L “z(m)” values appear to be swapped.
The Z levels in 3FM52L were conceived for the building, and so I’m not 100% sure they will be meaningful for the tokamak. But the ones used in 34YGP3 and shown below in your email are not suitable, in my opinion. They are too high, for instance:
These things don’t make much sense.
I’d say for future studies this should be reconsidered. If the ones of 3FM52L are suitable, they should be used. If not, a tuned version should be conceived.
Regards, Raul