Closed jgrewe closed 3 years ago
Merging #822 into master will decrease coverage by
0.26%
. The diff coverage isn/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #822 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 95.35% 95.09% -0.27%
==========================================
Files 181 181
Lines 13558 12753 -805
==========================================
- Hits 12928 12127 -801
+ Misses 630 626 -4
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/Dimensions.cpp | 82.42% <0.00%> (-10.26%) |
:arrow_down: |
include/nix/Tag.hpp | 100.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
include/nix/Dimensions.hpp | 98.95% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
test/BaseTestDimension.cpp | 100.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
test/BaseTestDataAccess.cpp | 100.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
test/hdf5/TestDimensionHDF5.hpp | 100.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
test/hdf5/TestDataAccessHDF5.hpp | 100.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
src/util/dataAccess.cpp | 91.30% <0.00%> (+1.59%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e92d0ac...80b5f2b. Read the comment docs.
updated the md file, please check. Further question/remark. So far the document is not linked from anywhere. What would be the best location for it?
The recent issue on NIXPy got me thinking about the rule selection again. I was about to ask for it to be finalised so we can merge it and get to work on the implementation but I think I'd like to clarify a few things.
Reading through it again there's one thing that I think isn't clear: What are the options available to the user when retrieving data through a Tag?
The answer (I think?) is RangeMatch::Exclusive
and RangeMatch::Inclusive
.
But given the first half of the document, it looks like it's about to propose we have five options (the five PositionMatch
rules.
I understand that the document wants to start with a discussion of potential rules and behaviour before talking about how it applies to ranges, but maybe we can make it more clear how it will look in the library. Perhaps a code snippet?
@achilleas-k I agree, this was actually made for us to be clear about the rules to implement for the index search. For a tutorial this is not good. We should leave it open and I will try to work on it
In that case maybe we can merge it as is and work on the tutorial separately.
... addresses issue #818
Please feel free to comment.