Closed adrianmnh closed 2 years ago
Provide constructive feedback on models per team member (Positives & Negatives) Suggest potential feature to be incorporated on project Submit work as an .md file or text comment on your issue
Oliver Vidal
− no model images uploaded
Amber Garcia
✓ Improved conceptual model with different payment methods ✓ Maintains most of the original eMovies model structure ✓ Use of user defined data types and domains ✓ Normalized tables − PaymentType on logical model not in Physical model, unable to link CustomerPaymentMethod to different payment methods, all use different PKs − MovieRental rate is an integer − Some tables do not have have a surrogate primary key
Jasmider Garcha
✓ Lots of subcategories add depth to the model ✓ Bitcoin as a payment method ✓ Grouping of customers and movie stars into one entity in conceptual model ✓ Subscription service added to conceptual model that can be used as a Streaming Hub ✓ Good use of data types for attributes on physical model ✓ Bridge table for Movie and Stars for multi-value "star" link to movie − Streaming Service multi tier subscription model can be reworked − Customer require 2 surrogate keys
Wade Li
✓ Addition of 3 different payment methods to model ✓ Addition of streaming option − Lack of depth and dimensions on logical and conceptual models − eStreams do not require a store, movie copies or employees − Attributes use unconstrained data types
Comment on individual group members' Conceptual, Logical and Physical models