Closed assembledStarDust closed 5 years ago
So the properties of the user object would be declared by the implementors? Therefore inconsistent from implementation to implementation?
We've already discussed this idea in WH1. The decision was to put whatever you have into input as a file.
So can this be closed, is there nothing actionable?
While there is information being passed via the WG4 spec, there may be instances where it is not enough, or there is something forgotten.
I'd propose a user data object to be added to job and task objects, or perhaps a field or (shudder) an array added to job and task objects.
This is so that there is flexibility for users to add info that is not contained within the original spec.
I'd propose object, as it could be retrieved by endpoint and less likely to break the core spec.