Closed ysavourel closed 4 years ago
Is there a string reason to have the list of its Input objects in given Job object as it is the case in the current Swagger API? (https://app.swaggerhub.com/apis/Alino/tapicc-api/0.0.7#/job)
In the other objects we use lists of IDs rather than the objects themselves.
good question, perhaps we should unify this, and all objects should return only themselves and not children directly but only list of ids. If no one objects to this in next week, I think we can change this.
changed https://github.com/GALAglobal/TAPICC-API-implementation/commit/f8c9fb78c2dc2fffc72ed20bb2199f0cb8047986
Is there a string reason to have the list of its Input objects in given Job object as it is the case in the current Swagger API? (https://app.swaggerhub.com/apis/Alino/tapicc-api/0.0.7#/job)
In the other objects we use lists of IDs rather than the objects themselves.