Closed j-faria closed 2 years ago
Hi João, we have some discrepancy between APIs of PyTorch and our own that should be fixed. We're currently very actively developing a new version of the library with additional models (Opper-Archambeau, Snelson, Titsias, Hensman) with sparse and variational support, as well as various likelihoods (Student-T, Laplace, Bernoulli for classification, Gamma, etc.). There is at the moment no support for MCMC using Pyro or pymc3 (we intend to use Pyro in the future, but if possible support for both would be nice).
I've fixed the very line you mention, which will allow using distributions from torch.distributions
but also our own at gpr.likelihoods
. Please keep in touch for advances on MCMC support!
If I understand correctly, each parameter in the mogptk models (and particularly in MOSM) can be assigned a value, trained/fixed, or assigned a prior distribution.
Regarding the prior, should I assign one of the distributions from
torch.distributions
to a given parameter? I've tried this, but had to changelog_p
intolog_prob
in this line on theParameter
class. Just wondering if this is the intended API.Another question is if MCMC sampling from the posterior for the model parameters is already implemented or if there is a straightforward way to use the mogptk models with e.g. pyro or pymc3.