Closed BryceStevenWilley closed 10 months ago
Noting that I left this open because I still need to test it. I'll try to do that tomorrow.
Got some extra testing in, which I'm glad about because it caught some extra errors.
Specifically requesting your review again @nonprofittechy, because I did make an assumption that docket numbers have to have numbers in them; otherwise anything with the letter P in it gets sent to the Appellate panel court, which didn't seem right (it's certain that confused users might type in sentences to a docket number field if they don't know it, and we shouldn't shunt them to the panel court in that case).
Got some extra testing in, which I'm glad about because it caught some extra errors.
Specifically requesting your review again @nonprofittechy, because I did make an assumption that docket numbers have to have numbers in them; otherwise anything with the letter P in it gets sent to the Appellate panel court, which didn't seem right (it's certain that confused users might type in sentences to a docket number field if they don't know it, and we shouldn't shunt them to the panel court in that case).
I agree with your decision there.
Is this ready for a full review then?
Is this ready for a full review then?
Yes! I'm happy with where it is now. If you think it's good I'll merge.
From a production error: