Closed jtenavidal closed 1 year ago
please keep in mind that dipole approximation for a nucleon->resonance transition is terrible, in fact worse than what Rein-Sehgal provides. I need to know more about what Afro did before this can be approved.
The code has been tested. The results are sumarised here: https://genie-docdb.pp.rl.ac.uk/DocDB/0003/000355/001/EMRES_impact.pdf
@dytman suggested to plot the impact of this change against e-N inclusive data: https://genie-docdb.pp.rl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/private/ShowDocument?docid=362 It can be seen that this change affects the inclusive cross section prediction.
It is important to keep in mind that this pull request only changes the configuration - it does not affect the code itself.
This pull request is based on the discussion by Afroditi at the GENIE Forum: https://genie-docdb.pp.rl.ac.uk/DocDB/0003/000334/005/Papadopoulou_GENIE_Core_Oct_10_2022.pdf
The main idea is that as it is now, the Form Factors used in EM mode come from a neutrino prescription. This might be problematic, so I use the alternative dipole form factors instead.
I noticed an additional potential issue - for EM the correction factor for the form factors should be different according to: https://genie-docdb.pp.rl.ac.uk/DocDB/0003/000334/005/tn260.pdf
This is now implemented