Open untereiner opened 8 months ago
So, if I iterate on my branch, the version number will not change.
To improve this version number, I think we should add a build part
(As semver seems to allow it).
We should also keep this issue in mind.
@castelletto1 What do we want to do regarding this?
if #3043 is merged, it will be easy to add versions by following the semantic conventions of the merged commit messsages.
The semver-action
will roll-out the commit messages between the tip and the previous release and analyse the prefixes to compute a new version number
What is the requested feature? Automate the code versioning process to have effective versioning of the code and maybe releases.
Is your request related to a specific problem? I would like an easy, human readable, comparable way to discriminate versions of the public API (i.e. represented as xsd files https://github.com/GEOS-DEV/GEOS/issues/2971). Not sure a commit hash is the right way.
Describe the solution you'd like I was thinking to something close to semver.
But, doing it manually is painful and time consuming. So what about using a github-action like this one: https://github.com/ietf-tools/semver-action. It will flow seamlessly for those using commit prefixes. For the others, we could simply avoid the
patch
part and adopt a simple algorithm like this one:This action will make the next version available as a variable in the pipeline. It should then be easy to patch the CMakeLists, a header file, xsd schemas, or whatever...
What to you think ?
Describe alternatives you've considered n.a.
Additional context n.a.
Work steps:
3043
3266