Closed arng40 closed 2 months ago
Attention: Patch coverage is 79.50311%
with 33 lines
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 55.75%. Comparing base (
3bf12d2
) to head (b47ffe8
). Report is 8 commits behind head on develop.:exclamation: Current head b47ffe8 differs from pull request most recent head c56f007
Please upload reports for the commit c56f007 to get more accurate results.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
How is all that connects with proposal about logLevel
labels in https://github.com/GEOS-DEV/GEOS/issues/3014 ?
This PR is related to the #3179 and not the #3014.
@TotoGaz Thanks for your feedback, in reply to your suggestion :
Would a highly coupled class be an issue? Group would only have 1 attribute & 1 getter for this class.
Or is it better to have a purely not coupled class? Group would have 1 attribute, 1 getter, and 1 method (appendLogLevelDescription()
).
This PR aim to document all
logLevel
in GEOS and to invite the contributors to set descriptions when they enable thelogLevel
wrapper:Currently, we have this output in all
Group
documentation files:This PR brings more context to all
logLevels
of GEOS:I.e.
SolidMechanics_LagrangianFEM.rst
: