Adding pressure stabilization for single phase poromechanics

[ryar9534]

Implemented stabilized flux kernels to enable pressure jump stabilization for single-phase poromechanics. Also moves some stabilization-related functions from MultiphasePoromechanics to PoromechanicsSolver, as now that single-phase stabilization exists it could be unified.

Also adding input files to perform integrated tests with more physical meaning directly related to pressure stability.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 1.40845% with 140 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 56.40%. Comparing base (f856214) to head (a1b9ad9). Report is 103 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...vers/fluidFlow/StabilizedSinglePhaseFVMKernels.hpp	0.00%	58 Missing :warning:
...hysicsSolvers/multiphysics/PoromechanicsSolver.hpp	0.00%	48 Missing :warning:
...onents/physicsSolvers/fluidFlow/SinglePhaseFVM.cpp	0.00%	21 Missing :warning:
.../physicsSolvers/fluidFlow/SinglePhaseHybridFVM.cpp	0.00%	3 Missing :warning:
...sSolvers/multiphysics/SinglePhasePoromechanics.cpp	0.00%	3 Missing :warning:
...vers/multiphysics/SinglePhaseReservoirAndWells.hpp	0.00%	3 Missing :warning:
...ers/fluidFlow/CompositionalMultiphaseHybridFVM.cpp	0.00%	2 Missing :warning:
...nents/physicsSolvers/fluidFlow/SinglePhaseBase.cpp	66.66%	1 Missing :warning:
...csSolvers/multiphysics/MultiphasePoromechanics.cpp	0.00%	1 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #3100 +/- ## =========================================== - Coverage 56.45% 56.40% -0.06% =========================================== Files 1022 1023 +1 Lines 86431 86508 +77 =========================================== - Hits 48794 48793 -1 - Misses 37637 37715 +78 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ryar9534]

Can we try to use in a case with a fault?

We can (it should work?), but I would like to know more about how tpfa is handled to make sure to get the element regions for stabilization right. I also still need to write the integrated tests for this PR.

[CusiniM]

Can we try to use in a case with a fault?

We can (it should work?), but I would like to know more about how tpfa is handled to make sure to get the element regions for stabilization right. I also still need to write the integrated tests for this PR.

if we want to add to the frac-matrix and frac-frac connections we probably can. The tpfa is basically the same as for the matrix just with some "special" transmissibilities. It's assembled by looping on the dedicated stencil types.

[paveltomin]

@ryar9534 there are some conflicts now, please resolve

[ryar9534]

@ryar9534 there are some conflicts now, please resolve

I think I have fixed this