WIth spack-stack-1.7.0, we revert to the spack develop version of UPPERCASEPACKAGENAME_ROOT instead of CaseSensitivePackageName_ROOT. This will require changing esmf_ROOT to ESMF_ROOT in `CMakelistst.txt:
I am surprised to find the spack-stack convention (CaseSensitivePackageName_ROOT) in CMakeLists.txt, since I though GEOS so far didn't use spack-stack. If your build systems also set esmf_ROOT, can you either consider changing those to ESMF_ROOT as well, or check for both esmf_ROOT and ESMF_ROOT inCMakeLists.txt, please?
diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt
index a5e6810..cef7ff7 100644
--- a/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -57,9 +57,9 @@ if (NOT Baselibs_FOUND)
endif()
if (NOT TARGET esmf)
- if (DEFINED ENV{esmf_ROOT})
- message (STATUS "Found esmf_ROOT in environment: $ENV{esmf_ROOT}")
- find_path(ESMF_CMAKE_PATH FindESMF.cmake HINTS "$ENV{esmf_ROOT}/cmake")
+ if (DEFINED ENV{ESMF_ROOT})
+ message (STATUS "Found ESMF_ROOT in environment: $ENV{ESMF_ROOT}")
+ find_path(ESMF_CMAKE_PATH FindESMF.cmake HINTS "$ENV{ESMF_ROOT}/cmake")
message (STATUS "Found FindESMF.cmake in: ${ESMF_CMAKE_PATH}")
if (ESMF_CMAKE_PATH)
message (STATUS "Appending to CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH: ${ESMF_CMAKE_PATH}")
@climbfuji My guess is this code is pretty much tested by you. I mean, I have built GEOS with mainline Spack and I guess it must be good enough? But you are our main customer for this, so a PR is incoming!
WIth spack-stack-1.7.0, we revert to the spack develop version of
UPPERCASEPACKAGENAME_ROOT
instead ofCaseSensitivePackageName_ROOT
. This will require changingesmf_ROOT
toESMF_ROOT
in `CMakelistst.txt:https://github.com/GEOS-ESM/GEOSgcm/blob/53409fd14ec9784246dfef7cc1063864bbc15565/CMakeLists.txt#L60
I am surprised to find the spack-stack convention (
CaseSensitivePackageName_ROOT
) inCMakeLists.txt
, since I though GEOS so far didn't use spack-stack. If your build systems also setesmf_ROOT
, can you either consider changing those toESMF_ROOT
as well, or check for bothesmf_ROOT
andESMF_ROOT
inCMakeLists.txt
, please?