Open mathomp4 opened 2 years ago
@mathomp4 This is an attractive solution to the current asymmetry; it would more clearly delineate the set of files specifically designated for OPS runs, and if a user wanted to update a particular resource file, they would not make the mistake of editing (for example) the version of the file in RC/ when they really meant to change the version under RC/AMIP.
This is a question for @amdasilva just from my own thoughts.
Currently in, say, CA2G we have:
where the OPS emissions files are the ones in the main directory. What I'm wondering is might there be a benefit to having instead:
We still use symlinks to prevent code duplication, but now it's a bit more obvious that some files belong to the OPS emissions without knowledge that the "main directory" ones are those.
I only say this because then in the
$EXPDIR/RC
directory, a user would have anOPS
,AMIP
, andAMIP.20C
directory where you'd know if you want to affect anOPS
emissions run, you change the files inOPS
. At the moment, you have to know that$EXPDIR/RC/CA2G_GridComp_ExtData.rc
is the one for OPS and$EXPDIR/RC/AMIP/CA2G_GridComp_ExtData.rc
is the one for AMIP.Obviously, we'd need to make scripting changes, etc (as well as concurrent changes in Chem), but it might make things a bit clearer?
Not sure. Thought I'd ask.