Closed BaptisteVandecrux closed 1 year ago
@BaptisteVandecrux I am fine with removing the 100% filter. However, we still need to be critical wrt. RH measurement over 100%. It could still be due to misreadings by the instrument. For instance, I strongly suspect misreadings for EGP before August 2021, possibly due to a wrongly calibrated sensor.
Ok, thanks! Then those periods should be flagged as suspicious, or removed if we believe they are not good enough.
It is a demand from a data user that confirms that super-saturation in winder over ice sheet are common.
See for exemple: Genthon, C., Piard, L., Vignon, E., Madeleine, J.-B., Casado, M., and Gallée, H.: Atmospheric moisture supersaturation in the near-surface atmosphere at Dome C, Antarctic Plateau, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 691–704, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-691-2017, 2017.
@robertfausto is this fine for you?