Open BHenkemans opened 2 months ago
I suggest making another page or a tab on the current committee page if making a distinction is even desirable. For "regular" members, this distinction is not relevant.
The avc|kcc|avw|rva
are relatively new; see GH-1057. Before that, everything was grouped under avc
(not that you could view those). The other types do not appear under the Committees
section, as it logically follows that committee
is a specific type and not also an umbrella for avc|kcc|avw|rva
.
I am firmly against adding another entry to the navbar. As such, there are two probable solutions: We can either consolidate all "organs" into one navbar entry and have a submenu for each "flavour" or have a nav-pill bar on the committees
page, similar to how we allow filtering on meeting types. However, I also do not like these two options either.
However, I also do not like these two options either.
Would it hurt to pretend that these are "just regular committees"? As I mentioned before, for most members, these are just committees. The types (in my eyes) are purely regulatory.
Would it hurt to pretend that these are "just regular committees"? As I mentioned before, for most members, these are just committees. The types (in my eyes) are purely regulatory.
I am getting old, so I like to complain more. I think the second option of adding a nav-pill bar is the best solution.
What would you like?
Currently, "other organs" (RvA, KCCs, and AVWs) are not visible on the committee page. However, some people may want to get information about these organs (for instance, to contact the organ or one of their members). The only way to do this right now is to guess someone in that organ and use the link of that organ on their member page.
Why is this needed?
The current method makes it difficult to find these organs if you don't know anyone in the body.
Other information
No response