Closed fretchen closed 8 months ago
I think that works well. Looking at the README discussion in #7 we could also add an MIT license for the (very little) amount of "code" that we have:
The GitHub product documentation in the assets, content, and data folders are licensed under a [CC-BY license](LICENSE).
All other code in this repository is licensed under the [MIT license](LICENSE-CODE).
I am personally a fan of the Creative-Commons-0. It puts the text into the public domain and avoids almost all legal fuzz, which will be quite a major bottleneck in adoptation around here anyways. Opinions ?