Closed matamadio closed 3 years ago
Suggest to call it "pop_occupancy" or "occupancy_period", both period and occupants to be optional fields.
Agreed on renaming, especially as we work more with DRF/insurance data occupancy is the term most commonly used to refer to building usage. Suggests to call table 'occupants' with the field renamed 'num_occupants' to be more specific Agree on making it optional.
This attribute basically applies only to population, residing in a location or just moving/working through a location.
It may be confused with "occupancy_enum" common type (see #26 ). I'd put it as optional instead of required since many occupancy types do not expect to have population data. May need more thinking.