fix: Fix some CVEs - Githubissues

spring-web 6.0.14 6.0.18 java-archive GHSA-hgjh-9rj2-g67j High
spring-web 6.0.14 6.0.17 java-archive GHSA-ccgv-vj62-xf9h High
tomcat-embed-core 10.1.16 10.1.19 java-archive GHSA-7w75-32cg-r6g2 Medium
tomcat-embed-websocket 10.1.16 10.1.19 java-archive GHSA-v682-8vv8-vpwr Medium libcrypto3 3.1.4-r5 3.1.4-r6 apk CVE-2024-2511 Unknown
libssl3 3.1.4-r5 3.1.4-r6 apk CVE-2024-2511 Unknown

The spring-boot and junit fixes resolve the first four. The container update fixes the lower two.

Pull Request Checklist

[ ] 1. I have rebased the latest version of the main branch into my feature branch and all conflicts have been resolved.
[ ] 2. I have added information about the change/addition to functionality to the CHANGELOG.md file under the [Unreleased] heading.
[ ] 3. I have documented my code using JDocs tags.
[ ] 4. I have removed unnecessary commented out code, imports and System.out.println statements.
[ ] 5. I have written JUnit tests for any new methods/classes and ensured that they pass.
[ ] 6. I have created API tests for any new functionality exposed to the API.
[ ] 7. If changes/additions are made to the ors-config.json file, I have added these to the ors config documentation along with a short description of what it is for, and documented this in the Pull Request (below).
[ ] 8. I have built graphs with my code of the Heidelberg.osm.gz file and run the api-tests with all test passing
[ ] 9. I have referenced the Issue Number in the Pull Request (if the changes were from an issue).
[ ] 10. For new features or changes involving building of graphs, I have tested on a larger dataset (at least Germany), and the graphs build without problems (i.e. no out-of-memory errors).
[ ] 11. For new features or changes involving the graphbuilding process (i.e. changing encoders, updating the importer etc.), I have generated longer distance routes for the affected profiles with different options (avoid features, max weight etc.) and compared these with the routes of the same parameters and start/end points generated from the current live ORS. If there are differences then the reasoning for these MUST be documented in the pull request.
[ ] 12. I have written in the Pull Request information about the changes made including their intended usage and why the change was needed.
[ ] 13. For changes touching the API documentation, I have tested that the API playground renders correctly.

Fixes # .

Information about the changes

Key functionality added:
Reason for change:

GIScience / openrouteservice

fix: Fix some CVEs #1788

Pull Request Checklist

Information about the changes

Examples and reasons for differences between live ORS routes, and those generated from this pull request

Required changes to ors config (if applicable)

Quality Gate passed