search

GLIMS-RGI / rgi7_scripts

Collection of scripts used for the generation of the RGI version 7 - WIP
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
8 stars 9 forks source link

RGI16: Cotopaxi RGI6 outline is not in GLIMS #30

Closed fmaussion closed 2 years ago

fmaussion commented 2 years ago

The red outline (in GLIMS) is actually from the RGI submission ID (i.e. it should be from RGI), but the outline is different.

A look at the RGI technical document explains it: GLIMS probably ingested RGI5:

image

image

fmaussion commented 2 years ago

Here is the outline for ingest: Cotopaxi_update.tar.gz

bruceraup commented 2 years ago

So, the RGI5 outline should be removed from GLIMS? That is, was it deemed to be incorrect? I take it that it was, since the area apparently grew by 24% from 1997 to 2000, based on the data. Just want to double-check.

fmaussion commented 2 years ago

Yes I'm not sure either about where the RGI5 outline came from. Graham seem to have decided that the RGI6 outline is more accurate.

bruceraup commented 2 years ago

Okay, I'm on this now.

On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 11:57 AM Fabien Maussion @.***> wrote:

Yes I'm not sure either about where the RGI5 outline came from. Graham seem to have decided that the RGI6 outline is more accurate.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/GLIMS-RGI/rgi7_scripts/issues/30#issuecomment-1108868989, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAL3IPR6WBIJ6NV724DX643VG3MHTANCNFSM5KKYSVBA . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

bruceraup commented 2 years ago

This re-ingest is done. New submission_id is 753.

fmaussion commented 2 years ago

Checked! It worked