search

GLTEN / terms-issues

For requesting new GLTEN terms and issues with existing terms
0 stars 1 forks source link

genotype (=crop variety) #4

Open carolinalisboa opened 4 years ago

carolinalisboa commented 4 years ago

Preferred Name

Alternative Name

(Please specify any alternative names for the concept, specify the language if not English)

Definition

(Please provide a definition for the concept, including a link to a public article, e.g. wikipedia)

Existing URI

(If the term exists in a public vocabulary such as AGROVOC, please state the vocabulary name and concept URI)

richardostler commented 4 years ago

I'm not sure listing varieties used is very useful, probably best to list as freetext.

Also I don't think variety and genotype are the same concept - genotype is narrower as a variety can have multiple different genotypes

carolinalisboa commented 4 years ago

There are a few experiments testing genotypes performance. Maybe its importance should be taken into consideration.

From: Richard Ostler notifications@github.com Sent: 15 November 2019 14:25 To: GLTEN/terms-issues terms-issues@noreply.github.com Cc: Carolina Cardoso-Lisboa carolina.lisboa@rothamsted.ac.uk; Author author@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [GLTEN/terms-issues] genotype (=crop variety) (#4)

I'm not sure listing varieties used is very useful, probably best to list as freetext.

Also I don't think variety and genotype are the same concept - genotype is narrower as a variety can have multiple different genotypes

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FGLTEN%2Fterms-issues%2Fissues%2F4%3Femail_source%3Dnotifications%26email_token%3DANUR4VSVMWOEBYW4JVPZ2VLQT2WK3A5CNFSM4JN3NQO2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEEFSHVA%23issuecomment-554378196&data=01%7C01%7Ccarolina.lisboa%40rothamsted.ac.uk%7C220fe2be593544e9b59508d769d791c2%7Cb688362589414342b0e37b8cc8392f64%7C1&sdata=VUyUeqIuhiddQcjJaYmlsrxmjQ3LSm84%2FFISh%2B6YShg%3D&reserved=0, or unsubscribehttps://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FANUR4VXCFY4725XOJ3KA3TDQT2WK3ANCNFSM4JN3NQOQ&data=01%7C01%7Ccarolina.lisboa%40rothamsted.ac.uk%7C220fe2be593544e9b59508d769d791c2%7Cb688362589414342b0e37b8cc8392f64%7C1&sdata=EhfVzUld%2FQKXuRIsX9LT0uVXJqEH%2BOukVwCIND15IjA%3D&reserved=0.

Rothamsted Research is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England at Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ under the registration number 2393175 and a not for profit charity number 802038.

richardostler commented 4 years ago

Ok, so I recommend we add genotype as a factor (separate to variety as a factor), but we probably don't won't to encourage every genotype to be listed as a factor variant - based on what I know of wheat experiments here there can be a lot tested and they're likely to change regularly.

carolinalisboa commented 4 years ago

ok