Closed billzt closed 3 years ago
+1 True, had same usability issue here
I know this doesn't really answer the question but if you are doing serious sequence searches with JBrowse, I would recommend setting up a BLAT/BLAST backend e.g. with sequenceserver. I think the RegexSequenceSearch doesn't necessarily scale too well and has some known issues with longer sequences #833
I guess if it is desirable we can try and find fixes for things like #833 but that's just my perspective on sequence searching
@cmdcolin Thanks for your suggestion. How to setup a BLAT/BLAST backend within JBrowse? Would it be difficult?
There is not necessarily a prescribed way to do this
It would be nice to have "recipes" for example, but I have only done it with sequenceserver https://jbrowse.org/docs/faq.html#how-can-i-link-blast-results-to-jbrowse
Well, in fact I mainly use this "search" function to locate primer/oligo sequences in 10~30nt, which seem not suitable to be searched in BLAST.
Maybe BLAT then, which would need a custom backend
The label obscuring the data is an issue with many track types. https://github.com/pombase/website/issues/1596 Scrolling left and right the required amount to see the features and labels clearly is too tricky...
It would be nice if there was a bit of headroom between the label and the data track.
One option that globally affects all tracks is setting
https://jbrowse.org/docs/global_options.html
trackLabels=no-block
In the jbrowse.conf. It is a valid concern. Might be interesting if the user can toggle this setting per track, or toggle the setting without having the admin reconfigure it
Add the option to create your own track label to the dev branch of this repo
feature added in 1.16.11
File -> Add sequence search track, input a sequences of about 20-30 bases
The label is solong that it covers the shown track!:
What should be better is:
I think this could be done (input a short name) in the pop dijitDialog in future.