Closed chrisdicaprio closed 7 months ago
For the NZ NSHM 2022 we had set crustal min mag = 6.8. However, the target MFD in the inversion was set to 6.9. To correct this, we had to set min mag = 6.799
See
I suspect the culprit may be in public static ArrayList<GutenbergRichterMagFreqDist> getCharSubSeismoOnFaultMFD_forEachSection(
public static ArrayList<GutenbergRichterMagFreqDist> getCharSubSeismoOnFaultMFD_forEachSection(
lines 124-136. See the TODO comment in the code below:
TODO
mMaxIndex = Math.max(mMaxIndex, totalTargetGR.getClosestXIndex(minMag)); // int mMaxIndex = totalTargetGR.getXIndex(upperMag); if(mMaxIndex == -1) throw new RuntimeException("Problem Mmax: " +rupSet.getMinMagForSection(s)+"\t"+rupSet.getFaultSectionDataList().get(s).getName()); /* * TODO: why does mMaxIndex = 14 return 6.449999999999999, while 15 returns 6.55 ?? */ double mMax = totalTargetGR.getX(mMaxIndex); // rounded to nearest MFD value //if(mMax<5.85) // System.out.println("PROBLEM SubSesMmax=\t"+mMax+"\tMinSeismoRupMag=\t" // +invRupSet.getFinalMinMagForSection(s)+"\t"+invRupSet.getFaultSectionData(s).getName()); GutenbergRichterMagFreqDist tempOnFaultGR = new GutenbergRichterMagFreqDist(totalTargetGR.getMinX(), totalTargetGR.size(),
For the NZ NSHM 2022 we had set crustal min mag = 6.8. However, the target MFD in the inversion was set to 6.9. To correct this, we had to set min mag = 6.799
See
I suspect the culprit may be in
public static ArrayList<GutenbergRichterMagFreqDist> getCharSubSeismoOnFaultMFD_forEachSection(
lines 124-136. See the
TODO
comment in the code below: