Open jean-christophe-manciot opened 4 years ago
I confirm that on the CSR-1000v-16.11.1b with 32 interfaces set:
CSR_1000v-16.11.1b#sh ip int bri
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
GigabitEthernet1 172.21.16.31 YES DHCP up up
GigabitEthernet2 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet3 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet4 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet5 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet6 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet7 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet8 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet9 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet10 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet11 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet12 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet13 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet14 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet15 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet16 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet17 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet18 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet19 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet20 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet21 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet22 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet23 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet24 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet25 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet26 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
It seems to be a misinterpretation of the field "Firs port name" on my part. I've just found a way to make the interfaces labels start at 1:
First port name:
Name format: Gi{port1}
@jean-christophe-manciot sorry for the delay but are we still behind on this?
@grossmj This issue has evolved with GNS3 GUI/Server 2.2.29:
So, the interfaces are correctly labelled for newly added devices, but are not modified on old labs. I've noticed a new way to modify the interfaces name in the "Configure custom adapters" menu. It is now kind of cumbersome to modify the numbering when there is a gap: all subsequent interfaces must be relabeled as well. For instance: Gi1, Gi0, Gi1, Gi2, Gi3, ... must be manually relabeled into Gi1, Gi2, Gi3, Gi4, Gi5...Gi31...
Isn't it possible to automatically increment the label of the next interfaces when one is modified? In the previous example, modifying Gi0 into Gi2 would automatically modify Gi1 into Gi3, Gi2 into Gi4 and so on.
If it's too much hassle, don't bother.
I have attached all new CML 2.0 appliances definitions through yaml files in case you don't already have them.
I have noticed: